HealthNews

Climate crisis It’s not over yet

Global warming is increasing, extreme weather is appearing all over the Climate crisis world. Intense heat, floods and deaths are now the main news. Is the world losing the war on climate change? Is this inactivity being denied the significance of this – or why? What is the way of liberation Noam Chomsky, an American linguist, is currently an Emeritus Professor at MIT and L’Oreat Professor of Linguistics at the University of Arizona. The number of books published by Noam Chomsky on various subjects is more than one and a half hundred.

CJ Polycranio: The harmful effects of climate change are coming to the fore every day. Noam Chomsky : As you may remember, three years ago Oxford physicist Raymond Pierrehumbert wrote, ‘Now is the time to panic. We are in great danger. The authors of the recently released Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report were led by Raymond Pierrehumbert.

A draft of the IPCC report went to AFP last June. There was a list of the final limits on some of the issues that the world has come close to. This is what surprises scientists even more. Extreme weather is similar to the observations made by environmentalist Michael Mann decades ago. But this situation is going beyond that prediction. This may be due to the fact that the warming of the atmosphere has not found a place in environmental studies.

There is a good side to this scary news. In this way, the world leaders may understand what kind of terrible situation they are creating. If you look at what is happening in front of your eyes, the Republican Party of the United States and its staunch supporters – ‘Fox News’ may think for a while about the reality. We have also seen signs of this in the Corona crisis. Republican governors who joked about the caution later took cognizance of the matter.

One of the effects of the policy makers’ disregard for environmental disasters is that it affects Climate crisis the minds of ordinary people. A recent survey found that 58 percent of Republicans do not care about climate change. According to more than 40 percent, people have no role to play here. And 44 percent think environmentalists are having an additional impact on policy-making discussions.

Naturally, all the political parties like themselves have made various promises in the election manifesto to solve this housing problem. But the problem is not just housing, Angela Merkel’s successor will have to deal with many more socioeconomic problems. That is why the interest of the world community in the results of the German election held today is endless.

Angela Merkel has been the Chancellor of Germany for the last 18 years. He has dealt with major crises সময়ে the financial crisis, the eurozone’s high debt crisis, the migration crisis caused by the war in Syria, and the epidemic that has been raging for two years now. Any one of these crises could lead to the downfall of any government. Under his rule, employment in Germany fell and the economy expanded by 34 percent, the highest among EU countries.

But the accusation against Angela Merkel is that she did not have the vision that she should have given to the nation in order to advance this success. Experts say inequality has increased in German society at this time. In addition, they have become dependent on the export of goods to China. Above all, there are allegations against Merkel for not investing enough in digitalization, evolving technology and renewable energy.

Germany is far ahead in heavy industry. That is why Germany is the largest emitter of carbon in the European Union. Experts say Germany needs to invest at least 54 trillion in technological advances to reduce carbon emissions to zero by 2045.This is the main challenge. To invest this amount, the government has to increase its income or borrow. But in the last year and a half, the German government has taken a loan to deal with the epidemic. Now, before the election, both the Conservative and Social Democrats have pledged to pull the reins of debt again. As a result, the main challenge for those who will win today’s election will be to rein in debt and ensure the necessary investment at the same time.

The leaders have promised that the country will come out of this trend by 2023. German economist Kirsten Brajesky tweeted that on the one hand there is a desire for structural change. This requires huge investment. On the other hand, there is talk of pulling the budget rush or curbing debt. As a result, the matter is becoming more and more like asking for a groom. If leaders are honest with the people, they should talk about the financial cost of this change. In addition, to decide whether the policy of austerity is appropriate or not.

About Author

Comment here

two × four =