Home » News » ‘Too late’: Some question why boosters weren’t authorized for all adults sooner
‘Too late Some question why boosters weren’t authorized for all adults sooner

‘Too late’: Some question why boosters weren’t authorized for all adults sooner

Friday’s authorization by federal officials to expand Covid-19 boosters shot eligibility to all adults was met with overwhelming support from public health experts. But some were puzzled as to why the Food and Drug Administration didn’t make the move sooner.

Despite a plan by the Biden administration to have boosters available to nearly all Americans by late September.

The FDA had only authorized a third shot of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine for certain populations.

Such as those 65 and older and people with underlying medical conditions, up until this point.

With enough convincing evidence to demonstrate safety in those groups.

Experts said they were frustrated that it took until now to authorize the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna boosters for everyone else.

“This is too late,” said Dr. Robert Murphy.

Executive director of the Institute for Global Health at the Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine and a professor of infectious diseases.

“What is the problem in getting the best treatment out there quickly?”

The FDA signoff, which was follow by an endorsement from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Formalizes what has cropped up in a patchwork of states in recent days.

Governors from Massachusetts to California have allowed people 18 and older to get boosters.

Their decisions come ahead of the holidays, when indoor gatherings are expect to lead to a spike in Covid cases, including breakthrough infections.

What to know about the Covid booster shot

“We’ve had the evidence for the need for boosters for several months,” said Dr. Dorry Segev.

Professor of surgery at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and professor of epidemiology at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

He added that he has heard of people fibbing to get boosters before they officially qualify.

“When you have people exaggerating their work situation or their medical risk situation or feeling like they have to flat-out lie to get the protection they need.

that’s a failing on the FDA and CDC’s part,” he said.

But others were not as quick to cast judgment, arguing the FDA needed time to review safety data.

Including the rare risk of myocarditis associated with the Covid shot and a third dose of it.

If anything, said Dr. Gregory Poland, director of the Mayo Clinic’s vaccine research group, the FDA was “working at record speed.

Given that Moderna only submitted its application for booster expansion earlier this week and Pfizer did so earlier this month.

“I think it would have been a public relations disaster to say ‘We aren’t going to review the data, we’re just going to approve it,’” he said.

Tener Goodwin Veenema, a professor and visiting scholar at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health agreed.

Armored truck spills money on California freeway sparking cash-grab frenzy

5 Georgia officers indicted on murder charges in festivalgoer’s death

“I just don’t think there’s anything to be gained in looking backwards and criticizing what has happen.

The FDA did not respond to NBC News regarding its booster shot timeline. In an interview Friday with The Associated Press.

The agency’s vaccine chief, Dr. Peter Marks, said “we move as rapidly as we can.”

“We have to do the right analyses to make sure that when we take an action, we can stand behind it.

He said. “Our goal is to make sure that the person who is on the fence, or perhaps doubting whether to take the vaccine.

Feels confident enough in our decisions that they are willing to come along and take the vaccine or take the booster.”

Boosters  Will people actually get a third dose?

The experts all agreed that initially allowing just a portion of the population to get boosters likely led to confusion.

“It’s fueling the anti-vaccine crowd,” Murphy said. “You don’t know if you’re suppose to take the vaccine or not take it.

If it works or not. This kind of messaging is not helping.”

While the FDA could have used more shade language — such as more forcefully indicating that their initial

Decision was based on the best available data at the time — the messaging problem was unavoidable, Poland believes.

“We were doing it in real-time,” he said. “If we had been studying these vaccines and using them for low-grade outbreaks over five or 10 years like most other vaccines.

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

1 × 5 =